Opponents of open primaries, like those criticizing State Question 835 (SQ 835), often rely on misleading arguments to sow doubt about this common-sense reform. Let’s set the record straight.
Criticism #1: “Open primaries are a ‘jungle’ with no rules.” Reality: SQ 835 is not a “jungle primary.” Candidates will appear on one primary ballot with their party affiliation clearly listed. The top two vote-getters, regardless of party, advance to the general election. This system is straightforward, transparent, and fair. It ensures the most broadly supported candidates move forward, giving voters real choices.
Criticism #2: “It disenfranchises party members.” Reality: SQ 835 doesn’t disenfranchise anyone—it does the opposite. It ensures every voter has a voice in every election. Under the current system, independents are locked out of most primaries, even though they pay taxes to fund these elections. Open primaries enfranchise all voters while still allowing party members to vote for candidates who align with their values.
Criticism #3: “It dilutes grassroots influence.” Reality: SQ 835 doesn’t dilute influence; it expands it. By encouraging candidates to appeal to a broader audience, open primaries make elections more competitive and inclusive. This benefits grassroots movements by giving them more opportunities to build coalitions and connect with voters outside their party.
Criticism #4: “There’s no evidence that open primaries increase voter turnout.” Reality: States with more inclusive primary systems tend to have higher voter engagement. For the second presidential election in a row, Oklahoma ranked dead last in voter turnout. When voters feel excluded, they disengage. Open primaries empower all voters to participate, leading to more engaged citizens and higher turnout. In fact, the Bipartisan Policy Center estimates that embracing open primaries has increased voter turnout by about 5% in other states. Open primaries are a proven way to give voters a reason to show up.
Criticism #5: “If independents want to vote, they should join a party.” Reality: Elections are publicly funded, and all voters should have access to the process. Requiring independents to join a party just to have a voice undermines their freedom to choose how they participate in democracy.
SQ 835 isn’t about helping or hurting any party—it’s about making elections fairer for everyone. Let’s cut through the noise and focus on what really matters: giving every voter a voice. Together, we can make Oklahoma’s elections more inclusive and representative.